Learn from the past: MV Rena grounding

At the period of handover, nobody was monitoring the position of the ship. At 0214 the Rena ran aground at full speed on Astrolabe Reef. The ship remained stuck fast on the reef and in the ensuing months it broke in two. The aft section moved off the reef and sank. About 200 tonnes of HFO were lost to the sea. A substantial amount of cargo in the containers was lost. The vessel became a total loss on 11 October 2011.

Probable causes

The several investigations on the aftermath of the disaster, including the official report by New Zealand's Transport Accident Investigation Committee (TAIC), highlighted that Rena grounding was a multi-factored accident resulting mostly from lack of procedural compliance.

In its official investigation into the accident, TAIC refers that the Rena grounding was not in any way attributable to the malfunction of any onboard machinery or navigational equipment.

However, it was discovered that Rena’s passage plan from Napier to Tauranga on the accident voyage did not meet the standards documented in the CIEL safety management system or the IMO Voyage Planning Guidelines.

The key cause of the accident was that the bridge crew progressively adjusted the automatic pilot to an incorrect heading and without making allowance for any leeway, set or gyrocompass error. The resultant ground track took the ship directly over the reef.

The Rena’s crew were not following company procedures with respect to monitoring the progress of the ship in relation to known dangers to navigation for the entire voyage from Napier to the time of the grounding. A failure to monitor adequately the progress of the Rena contributed directly to the grounding.

...TAIC report reads.

Meanwhile, the second mate's deviation to save time increased the risk and directly contributed to the grounding, TAIC underlined, adding that he 'was not making the most effective use of the bridge navigation equipment' before the grounding.

Investigation revealed that this was not the crew's first lack of compliance with procedures, as a review of previous voyage plans revealed a number of acts and omissions similar to those made on the accident voyage.

Equally notable was the fact that the master assumed control of the Rena when the ship was tracking directly for Astrolabe Reef and he 'had received virtually no information on where the ship was, where it was heading, and what immediate dangers to navigation he needed to consider.'

Another significant aspect highlighted was fatigue, as it was found that Rena had called at five New Zealand ports in six days.

TAIC noted that the master’s schedule in the three days preceding the accident placed him 'at risk of his cognitive performance being impaired by fatigue', while the second mate’s schedule 'was, at least, a mild to moderate risk of his cognitive performance being impaired by fatigue'.

Environmental consequences

The grounding of the Rena on Otaiti claimed no lives, but it has been referred to as New Zealand’s worst marine environmental disaster and the second most expensive salvage operation in maritime history.

The ship grounded with 1,700 tonnes of heavy oil and 200 tonnes of diesel fuel onboard on 5 October. By 9 October, a 5 km oil slick was evident and by 10 October, oil began washing ashore at Mount Maunganui beach. Bad weather that night caused the ship to shift further onto the reef resulting resulting in a further 130 - 350 tonnes of oil leaking and crew evacuation.

On 14 October, it was reported that the ship's hull had cracked in half, and a change in the wind direction meant that oil was likely to spread as far as as Whakatane and Opotiki.

In January 2012, the Rena completely broke in half and the stern section slipped off of the reef and eventually sank. A small amount of oil and containers escaped the ship as it broke in half.

Within the range of where the oil spilled the rare New Zealand spotted dotterel bird and 25 other native birds species inhabit. The beaches affected were closed until cleanup crews arrived, and locals were instructed to keep a distance from the shore and the oil clusters.

The environmental consequences were also reported in numbers:

• About 2,000 seabirds died and an estimate of 20,000 birds are thought to be victims of the oil spill through their ecosystem and food sources being contaminated.
• 383 oiled little blue penguins were admitted to the oiled wildlife facility, 95% of these were released back to the wild
• 89 dead oiled penguins were recovered through the response.

Liability

Both the captain and navigation officer were charged for operating a vessel in a manner likely to cause danger under the Maritime Transport Act 1994, and for discharging a contaminant under the Maritime Transport Act 1994 , as well as on other charges under the Crimes Act for including attempting to pervert the course of justice. They pleaded guilty to 11 charges and were sentenced to jail for seven months, but served half the time.

The Greek owner of the ship was fined $300,000 after pleading guilty under New Zealand's Resource Management Act.

Recommendations

TAIC recommended:

• The shipowner to evaluate the effectiveness of its SMS to ensure 'that the issues identified with that system as applied on board the Rena do not affect other vessels within its fleet.'
• Maritime New Zealand to promote, through IMO, the transparency of the system for auditing countries' seafarer training systems and monitor and control the use of virtual aids to navigation around the New Zealand coast.

Lessons learned

1. The investigators' attention on the aftermath of the environmental tragedy focused on the need of crew compliance with mandatory requirements and best industry practice for passage planning and watchkeeping.
2. Equally highlighted was the need for ship managers to ensure that their safety management systems are delivering safe ship operations.
3. TAIC's official report also emphasized on the importance of countries complying with the requirements of maritime education, training and certification under STCW Convention, so that seafarers emerging from the system are trained to an appropriate standard.
4. Fatigue as a key industry concern surrounding life onboard emerged through this incident to highlight once more how lack of sleep and intense workforce can have disastrous consequences.

Did you know?

• The Ministry for the Environment and Bay of Plenty Regional Council launched an official website on the Rena Recovery Project.
• 800 people involved in the cleanup response team, including 500 military personnel, while 8000 volunteers helped with the cleanup.
• In an attempt to save the animals, people knitted jumpers and sweaters for little blue penguins to wear.
• The incident was not immediately brought to the public eye since it took place on 5 October 2011, the same day the well-known American businessman Steve Jobs died.
• On 14 October 2011, the Filipino crew of the Rena left New Zealand "for their safety" after a racist backlash against Filipinos in Tauranga.