Accident details: At a glance
- Type of accident: Capsizing
- Vessel(s) involved: Alexander L. Kielland (oil platform)
- Date: 27 March 1980
- Place: off Norway
- Fatalities: 123
- Pollution: No
The incident
In the evening hours of 27 March 1980, the semi-submersible oil drilling platform ‘Alexander L. Kielland’ was in the Ekofisk oil field, in the North Sea, offshore Norway, providing offshore accommodation for the production platform Edda 2/7C.
Weather conditions were rainy and there was mist. The wind was gusting to 40 knots with waves up to 12 m high. The rig had just been winched away from the Edda production platform.
At about 6:30 pm, most men were off duty in the accommodation on Alexander L. Kielland, when they felt a 'sharp crack' followed by 'some kind of trembling', survivors said. Within seconds, the platform tilted between 35 and 40 degrees.
Lights went out and people rushed outside, but life-saving equipment could not be used due to the heavy listing.
Five of the six anchor cables had broken, the one remaining cable preventing the rig from capsizing. The list continued to increase and at 18:53, the remaining anchor cable snapped, and the rig capsized.
Four lifeboats were launched, but only one managed to release from the lowering cables.
Fatalities and injuries
From the 212 people onboard, the 123 were killed in the accident. A total of 89 people survived.
Some of the survivors were saved thanks to the platform’s lifeboats and rafts. Two 12-man rafts were thrown from Edda and rescued 13 people. Seven men were taken from the sea by supply boats and seven swam to Edda.
-
- Learn from the past: Costa Concordia disaster
- Learn from the past: Bow Mariner incident
- Learn from the past: Exxon Valdez incident
- Learn from the past: The Princess of the Seas deadly sinking
- Learn from the past: Deepwater Horizon oil spill
- Learn from the past: Fire on board car carrier “Eurasian Dream”
- Learn from the past: MV Rena grounding
- Learn from the past: Prestige sinking, one of the worst oil spills in Europe
- Learn from the past: Erika oil spill, Europe’s environmental disaster
- Learn from the past: Ocean Ranger: Commemorating North America’s offshore disaster
- Learn from the past: Superferry14: The world’s deadliest terrorist attack at sea
- Learn from the past: Stellar Daisy sinking: Two years on and what?
- Learn from the past: Moby Prince: Italy’s worst maritime disaster since World War II
- Learn from the past: Sewol sinking: South Korea’s ferry disaster
- Learn from the past: MT Haven: The worst oil spill ever in the Mediterranean
- Learn from the past: Herald of Free Enterprise: A wake-up call for Ro-Ro safety
- Learn from the past: Cougar Ace: How improper ballast water exchange can prove costly
- Learn from the past: Harvest Caroline: A case study on improper safety management
- Learn from the past: Bourbon Dolphin: A tragic example of ISM non-compliance
- Learn from the past: Pasha Bulker beaching: A mix of poor SMS, fatigue and bad weather
- Learn from the past: Viking Islay enclosed space fatalities: Rescuers becoming victims
- Learn from the past: Cosco Busan: Lack of communication, poor oversight and 53,500 gallons of oil in San Francisco Bay
- Learn from the past: MS Oliva grounding: Oil spill in one of the world’s most remote areas
- Learn from the past: Bulk Jupiter sinking: A stark reminder of bauxite cargo risks
- Learn from the past: USS John S McCain collision: A prime example of poor oversight
- Learn from the past: Sanchi: The world’s worst oil tanker disaster in decades
- Learn from the past: Torrey Canyon: The world’s first major oil tanker disaster
- Learn from the past: Amoco Cadiz oil spill: The largest loss of marine life ever
- Learn from the past: Piper Alpha: The world’s deadliest offshore oil disaster
- Learn from the past: USS Fitzgerald deadly collision: Poor seamanship in the spotlight
- Learn from the past: Alexander L. Kielland: Norway's worst offshore disaster
Probable causes
The investigation report of a Norwegian public commission in March 1980 revealed that a fatigue crack had propagated from the double fillet weld near the hydrophone mounted to the tabular bracing D6.
As a result, the five other tubular bracings connecting to the vertical column D broke off due to overload and the column D became separated from the platform. Consequently, the platform became unbalanced and capsized.
The official accident report concluded that the cause of failure occurred in the following sequence:
- Fatigue crack growth occurred from pre-existing cracks in the insert fillet welds between a hydrophone support and the brace D-6.
- Fatigue crack propagation part way around the circumference of the insert, then moving into the brace and around its circumference with brace failure by overload.
- The subsequent failure of the remaining five braces joining the column D-6 to the rig, by plastic collapse.
Key causes of the rig collapse also included:
- the poor material properties of the hydrophone tube and poor welding,
- inadequate design fatigue life of the fillet weld at the hydrophone mount; and
- the fracturing continued in the early history of the platform causing a redistribution of stresses.
Lessons learned
An immediate consequence of the Alexander L. Kielland disaster was the tightening of command organization on offshore installations in the North Sea, identifying a clear authority who would order abandonment in case of emergency.
In response to the Alexander L. Kielland disaster and based on the investigation findings, the Norwegian Maritime Directorate obligated redundancies of stability and structural strength and life-saving equipment for offshore oil drilling platforms.
Meanwhile, the IMO reviewed the MODU Code, strengthening standards for stability, motion characteristics, maneuverability, watertight doors and structural strength of the oil drilling platforms.
On the aftermath, significant attention was given also to the evacuation and rescue operations that had revealed extensive shortcomings. Only one lifeboat was in fact launched successfully, others were smashed against the platform during launching in high waves, while another one was totally unavailable due to listing.
The failure to deploy lifeboats led to new legislation regarding on-load release hooks for lifeboats on oil rigs, (but also warned of accidents that had happened with on-load release gear, as happened at the ALPHA platform, where several were killed.)
Consequently, the IMO issued a requirement for all lifeboats on merchant ships to be fitted with hooks that could be released even when they were under load.
Did you know?
See here a memorial of the accident: