Subscribe to our Mailing Lists (It's free!)
Friday, May 2, 2025
SAFETY4SEA
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    lessons learned

    Lessons learned: Refrain from risky recreational activities

    internet mobile phone

    Gard: Road safety lessons for mobile phone use onboard

    Lessons learned: Closer assessment and vetting was required for crew competency

    Lessons learned: Don’t overlook secondary hazards

    connectivity

    Pilbara Ports take steps to enhance connectivity for seafarers

  • SEAFiT
    • All
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
    relax

    In the calm lies the cure: Exploring the parasympathetic nervous system

    malaria

    Navigating malaria at sea: Why prevention requires a rethink

    Book Review: Building leaders the MMMA way

    Book Review: Developing soft skills in mariners

    mindfulness

    The new wave of Mindfulness: 7 Key trends

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    co2 carrier

    Europe’s first offshore CO₂ carrier to hit waters

    hydrogen

    BV joins European liquid hydrogen research program

    port of rotterdam

    Port of Rotterdam launches bid for reducing port emissions

    LNG

    US looks into updating LNG infrastructure

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    internet mobile phone

    Gard: Road safety lessons for mobile phone use onboard

    connectivity

    Pilbara Ports take steps to enhance connectivity for seafarers

    training simulators

    Companies shake hands for advanced training simulators

    seafarers gps

    NorthStandard: Key measures when the GPS fails

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
    inspection

    Tokyo MoU Annual Report 2024

    malta flag

    Malta: New requirements for vessel registration and seaworthiness

    LPG tanker

    Bangladesh arrests LPG tanker following 2024 fire incident

    PSC training

    IMO conducts Port State Control training in Comoros

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    Baltic Exchange

    Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 28 April – 2 May

    Syria

    CMA CGM invests $260 million in Syrian port development

    Odfjell: A global market-based measure with a carbon price is vital for industry’s energy efficiency

    GMF evaluates its impact regarding sustainability matters

    port of rotterdam

    Port of Rotterdam launches bid for reducing port emissions

  • Columns
    Achilles

    Achilles: Improving supply chain transparency can have a bottom line benefit

    port state control

    Linking ship to shore: Enabling direct communication between onboard crew with Port State Control

    eu shipping

    FuelEU maritime regulation and insights

    Trending Tags

    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    lessons learned

    Lessons learned: Refrain from risky recreational activities

    internet mobile phone

    Gard: Road safety lessons for mobile phone use onboard

    Lessons learned: Closer assessment and vetting was required for crew competency

    Lessons learned: Don’t overlook secondary hazards

    connectivity

    Pilbara Ports take steps to enhance connectivity for seafarers

  • SEAFiT
    • All
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
    relax

    In the calm lies the cure: Exploring the parasympathetic nervous system

    malaria

    Navigating malaria at sea: Why prevention requires a rethink

    Book Review: Building leaders the MMMA way

    Book Review: Developing soft skills in mariners

    mindfulness

    The new wave of Mindfulness: 7 Key trends

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    co2 carrier

    Europe’s first offshore CO₂ carrier to hit waters

    hydrogen

    BV joins European liquid hydrogen research program

    port of rotterdam

    Port of Rotterdam launches bid for reducing port emissions

    LNG

    US looks into updating LNG infrastructure

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    internet mobile phone

    Gard: Road safety lessons for mobile phone use onboard

    connectivity

    Pilbara Ports take steps to enhance connectivity for seafarers

    training simulators

    Companies shake hands for advanced training simulators

    seafarers gps

    NorthStandard: Key measures when the GPS fails

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
    inspection

    Tokyo MoU Annual Report 2024

    malta flag

    Malta: New requirements for vessel registration and seaworthiness

    LPG tanker

    Bangladesh arrests LPG tanker following 2024 fire incident

    PSC training

    IMO conducts Port State Control training in Comoros

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    Baltic Exchange

    Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 28 April – 2 May

    Syria

    CMA CGM invests $260 million in Syrian port development

    Odfjell: A global market-based measure with a carbon price is vital for industry’s energy efficiency

    GMF evaluates its impact regarding sustainability matters

    port of rotterdam

    Port of Rotterdam launches bid for reducing port emissions

  • Columns
    Achilles

    Achilles: Improving supply chain transparency can have a bottom line benefit

    port state control

    Linking ship to shore: Enabling direct communication between onboard crew with Port State Control

    eu shipping

    FuelEU maritime regulation and insights

    Trending Tags

    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
SAFETY4SEA

SeaSense: Passage Planning – Meeting the Standard!

by John Southam and David Berkeley
February 9, 2022
in Loss Prevention, Opinions
SeaSense: Passage Planning – Meeting the Standard!
FacebookTwitterEmailLinkedin

John Southam and David Berkeley provide the legal perspective in the case of CMA CGM Libra in SeaSense column, our special column in association with the North P&I Club.

Early in the morning of the 18 May 2011, the container vessel CMA CGM Libra departed Xiamen on passage to Hong Kong with a draft of just over 15m. After the pilot left the vessel, the vessel continued to proceed down the fairway and out to open sea.

The passage plan being followed by the vessel’s crew was prepared by the 2/O and approved by the Master. As this incident occurred in 2011, the vessel’s primary means of navigation was paper charts.

RelatedNews

CMA CGM invests $260 million in Syrian port development

NTSB Investigation: Engine room fire onboard towing vesel

Initially the vessel was in the fairway proceeding outbound, however at approximately 02:25 the vessel altered to the south and departed the fairway. It remains unclear as to why the Master made this decision but, in a statement, taken shortly after the incident, the Master said he was concerned his ship was heading into shallow water within the fairway, but had “plenty of water” to leave and then re-join the fairway between buoys 14-1 and 14. This allowed the trial judge to conclude that the Master took a deliberate decision to navigate outside the buoyed fairway.

At 02:35 on the 18 May 2011, whilst outside the buoyed fairway, CMA CGM Libra was confirmed to the local VTS as aground. At this time the charted depth was noted as between 27 and 30 metres.

If it was deep enough, why did it happen?

The area where CMA CGM Libra grounded was a former mined area, and as such there had been no recent accurate hydrographic survey of the area, so the depths were unreliable.

Indeed, at the time of the incident a temporary and preliminary notice (T&P) was in force, NM6276 P-10. This stated that charted depths outside of the fairway were unreliable. However, the T&P was not marked on the chart, and the chart did not contain any warnings or no-go zones to warn the bridge team that depths less than charted existed outside of the fairway.

When should this have been noted?

The standard for passage planning has been around for many years, the process remains unchanged even though technological changes have brought the use of ECDIS to the industry. The process remains:

  • Appraisal – This is where the officer conducting the plan gathers together all information that is relevant to the upcoming passage. This includes navigation warnings and T&P notices.
  • Planning – After gathering the information together, the officer then uses this as the foundation to start planning the passage.
  • Execution – After the plan is approved by the Master and reviewed by the bridge team, the plan is executed.
  • Monitoring – The bridge team monitor the intended passage by all appropriate means.

As can be seen in the case of the CMA CGM Libra, there were apparent failings in the appraisal and planning phases. The T&P notice that warned of unreliable depths, should have been noted. Then armed with this knowledge, the officer preparing the passage plan should have made the appropriate mark on the chart in the form of a no-go zone and in the narrative section of the passage plan.

What happened in the courts?

The Owners of CMA CGM Libra commenced legal proceedings to recover unpaid General Average (“GA”) contributions from some of the cargo interests after they refused to pay their GA contributions, arguing that errors within the vessel’s passage plan had rendered the vessel unseaworthy (i.e., there had been actionable fault for the purposes of Rule D of the York-Antwerp Rules).

Cargo interests criticised the passage plan in a number of aspects, but the critical error was the failure to record “all areas of danger” in accordance with the IMO guidelines for passage planning. In particular, the passage plan did not reflect a recent T&P notice advising that depths on the approaches to Xiamen were less than charted. By contrast, Owners’ case was that the grounding was caused by an uncharted shoal.

The case went before the English Admiralty Court, the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court.

At first instance the English Admiralty Court held that:

  1. The Master’s decision to deviate from the fairway was negligent on the basis that a prudent mariner would have concluded that it was not safe to navigate outside of the fairway in circumstances where a T&P notice warned of unreliable depths.
  2. The passage plan was defective as it should include all areas of danger. The passage plan and working charts should have been marked with a warning to the effect of: “depths less than charted exist outside of the fairway”.
  3. Passage planning was an aspect of seaworthiness, and that a prudent owner would require an adequate passage plan to be put in place before the beginning of the voyage. In the present case, the vessel was deemed to be unseaworthy at the beginning of the voyage by reason of a defective passage plan.
  4. The defective passage plan was causative of the master’s negligent decision to leave and navigate outside of the buoyed fairway.
  5. The negligence in the preparation of the passage plan amounted to a failure to exercise due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy as required by article III, rule 1 of the Hague Rules.
  6. The owner’s duty to exercise due diligence was non-delegable; and
  7. The cargo interests had established causative unseaworthiness, and the owners had failed to establish the exercise of due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy. Cargo interests were therefore not liable to contribute to GA.

The Owners of CMA CGM Libra appealed to the Court of Appeal on two questions of law, but the Court of Appeal found that the Admiralty Judge at first instance had correctly applied the law and dismissed the appeal. The Owners of CMA CGM Libra subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court on the same two questions of law.

The Supreme Court agreed that the vessel was unseaworthy because she commenced her voyage with a defective passage plan and confirmed that Owners were unable to rely on a defence that they had exercised due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy because the crew’s negligence in preparing the defective passage plan was attributable to the carrier. The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the English Admiralty Court and Court of Appeal and unanimously dismissed the appeal.

The Supreme Court judgment also provides guidance on a number of important issues in the area of seaworthiness, beyond passage planning.

A SUMMARY OF THE SUPREME COURT CAN BE FOUND HERE

What does this mean to the crews and operators?

So, is this about setting a new standard for passage planning? The reason that the process and standard of passage planning has stood the test of time is simply that if followed, it works. The incident on the CMA CGM Libra was a result of the crew missing out certain steps in the passage planning process.

As such, to prevent such incidents in the future it is important that crews follow this tried-and-tested process when passage planning, completing all the steps outlined above fully.

Operators need to ensure that crew are following the process and best practice guidance. Some things that may help this process include:

  • A clear and understandable SMS procedure. Make sure your procedures are written for the crew and that they are systematic. This is not a document written for lawyers but for the crew to follow and understand.
  • Reference IMO Res. A.893, make sure all best practice is included in the SMS.
  • Ensure that publications such as the ICS bridge procedures guide are available on board and that crew are familiar with its contents.
  • Ensure that when crews sit their bridge team and bridge resources management courses, adequate time is spent on highlighting the importance of proper passage planning and the process. If you don’t have your own training facility, make sure your provider is giving the correct standard of training to your crew.
  • Hold regular seminars and in-house crew training using case studies such as the CMA CGM Libra to highlight the importance of proper passage planning.
  • Consider a navigation safety campaign, keep the importance of correct standards in passage planning at the forefront of your safety message.
  • Navigation audits: remember that these can be done either in person or remotely using VDR data. Auditing performance allows operators to identify trends and focus on areas for potential improvement.

North has a member benefit in place that allows North members over 40% off remote navigation audits.

This isn’t about setting new standards; it is all about ensuring existing standards are fully met.

 

SeaSense: Passage Planning – Meeting the Standard!

SeaSense: Passage Planning – Meeting the Standard!SeaSense: Passage Planning – Meeting the Standard!
SeaSense: Passage Planning – Meeting the Standard!SeaSense: Passage Planning – Meeting the Standard!
Tags: CMA CGMcourtincident investigationNorth ClubPassage PlanningSeaSense
Previous Post

Denmark extradites Scot Carrier’s second officer accusing him of manslaughter

Next Post

Report analyzes the benefits of Washington’s decarbonization transportation

John Southam

John Southam

John is a Master Mariner and joined from a survey and marine consultancy company. Previous to this, John was engaged in shipyard operations conducting new build DP vessel projects in Asia as an owners project representative. He also worked at sea for 16 years, initially on Container Vessels with P&O Nedlloyd, and then on board offshore vessels including a range of DP vessels, AHTS, PSVs, drilling units, and offshore wind farm construction lift boats.

David Berkeley

David Berkeley

David joined North in January 2020 and works in the P&I Claims team. Prior to joining the North, David worked with Ince & Co in both Singapore and in London where he worked predominantly on Casualty and Admiralty matters. David also spent several years at sea, working as a Deck Officer with Swire Pacific Offshore, Maersk Line and P&O Nedlloyd.

Related News

NTSB Investigation: Contact of towing vessel with vane dike
Accidents

NTSB Investigation: Contact of towing vessel with vane dike

April 25, 2025
nuclear
Green Shipping

Industry coalition explores the potential of nuclear shipping

April 23, 2025
NTSB Invastigation
Accidents

NTSB Investigation: Engine room fire onboard passenger vessel

April 23, 2025
LPG tanker
Detentions

Bangladesh arrests LPG tanker following 2024 fire incident

April 22, 2025
Sewol ferry
Accidents

Report finds Sewol ferry disaster was a result of structural failures

April 17, 2025
Maersk Shekou
Accidents

ATSB interim report: Container ship collision with tall ship in Fremantle

April 17, 2025

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore more

No Result
View All Result
MARITIME EVENTS

Explore

  • Safety
  • SEAFiT
  • Green
  • Smart
  • Risk
  • Others
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

Useful Links

  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policies
  • Advertising
  • Content Marketing
  • Contact

© 2025 SAFETY4SEA

No Result
View All Result
  • Safety
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
  • SEAFiT
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
  • Green
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
  • Smart
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
  • Risk
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Case Studies
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
  • Others
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
  • Columns
    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Opinions
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Tip of the day
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

© 2025 SAFETY4SEA

Manage your privacy
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Manage options
{title} {title} {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Safety
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
  • SEAFiT
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
  • Green
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
  • Smart
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
  • Risk
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Case Studies
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
  • Others
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
  • Columns
    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Opinions
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Tip of the day
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

© 2025 SAFETY4SEA