A recent Safety Flash by the International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA), focuses on an incident, in which work was stopped during the practical evaluation portion of rigger training in an onshore industry.
The incident
It was discovered that the application of eye-nuts were not consistent with their intended use. The task was to install rigging and lift a something using a 4-leg bridle chain with adjustable length legs. The attachment points, for the 4-leg bridle chain to the load were four machined eye-nuts. A student questioned the safe working load limit of the 1/2″ eye-nut, which was assumed to be installed by the manufacturer of the item being lifted. After researching the eye-nut, a note was found accompanied with the load chart stating that the eye-nut installed was “for in-line picks only.” At that point, work was stopped. The rigging plan to be used involved rigging on the eye-nuts at a 60° angle. Not only were the eye-nuts not being used as intended, but additionally when picking with sling-angles, load capacities are reduced, which would have put the eye-nuts above their safe working load limit.
What went right
- The instructor of the class had encouraged a “questioning attitude”;
- The student did not assume the manufacturer-supplied eye-nuts were suitable for the task and questioned the rigging plan;
- Work was stopped;
- This was a real-time example of the importance of inspecting and verifying every link in a rigging plan.
Lessons learned
- Encourage a questioning attitude and a culture where “there are no stupid questions”.