In stark contrast to media reports claiming that the use of LNG as a marine fuel can reduce the industry’s CO2 emissions by 75%, Ian Adams, the former CEO of the International Bunker Industry Association and often called upon as an expert witness in bunker dispute cases, said:
“Whilst it is well documented that LNG is an excellent solution for reducing SOx and NOx emissions, I am dismayed to see it being promoted as a solution for reducing GHGs.”
Referring to a Reuters’ interview with Bernhard Schulte Group’s corporate director of energy projects, Angus Campbell, Adams said:
“It is a complete falsehood to suggest, as Reuters has, that ‘global efforts to cut carbon dioxide emissions will be key for the adoption of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel’.”
Adams, a Fellow of the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science & Technology who now heads the Association of Bulk Terminal Operators, said:
“The energy content of LNG is slightly more than half that of fuel oil, so to extract the same energy output when consuming LNG rather than fuel oil it is necessary to consume almost twice the volume of LNG. Whilst the chemical makeup of LNG will admittedly result in a slightly lower CO2 emission, it is certainly not a large magnitude; but there is another important consideration: LNG is principally methane. With methane recognised as a GHG and widely considered to be twenty-five times more harmful than CO2, it would only require a 4% slip through the supply chain to equal the CO2 emissions from the industry’s current consumption of heavy fuel oil.
“If we, rather generously, accept that burning LNG will reduce CO2 emissions by 20% over the current level it would require less than 1% slip for there to be no gain from a GHG perspective. Taken over the entire supply chain, 1% is not an unrealistic slip. Unfortunately, the LNG myth has progressed unchecked with very few challenging those lobbying for a wider take up of LNG.”
Adams’ comments follow the recent decision by the International Maritime Organisation to adopt mandatory requirements for ships of 5000gt and above to collect consumption data for each type of fuel oil they use in order to provide information for future decisions on additional measures to reduce shipping’s greenhouse gas emissions.
“The LNG myth has progressed unchecked,” says bunker expert Adams
The views presented hereabove are only those of the author and not necessarily those of GREEN4SEA and are for information sharing and discussion purposes only.
[divider]
About Ian Adams
Ian Adams is a Fellow of the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science & Technology and he now heads the Association of Bulk Terminal Operators.
Mr. Adams is an experienced Association Executive with over 30 years experience in the maritime industry.
Before becoming the head of the Association of Bulk Terminal Operators he served as Executive Director at International Dry Bulk Terminals Group. Furthermore he was a Council Member atSouthern Joint Branch RINA & IMarEST and he was also a former CEO at the International Bunker Industry Association.
Mr. Adams has a HND in Marine Engineering from the Warsash College of Maritime Studies
