Legal Implications of Deepwater Horizon disaster Continue to Emerge
100,000 individual claims against BP and Transocean Ltd The legal impacts of the Deepwater Horizon disaster continue to reverberate throughout the maritime community, most recently in the form of a lengthy court order issued in the multi-district litigation involving persons affected by the explosion, fire, and sinking of the rig in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast in April 2010.The order resolved a variety of preliminary and procedural issues raised in the over 100,000 individual claims. The claims are against BP, as well as Transocean Ltd., the Switzerland-based owner and operator of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, the Houston-based Halliburton Co., which was responsible for cementing services, and Cameron International Corp, which provided blowout prevention equipment. These companies sought to dismiss all claims brought pursuant to either general maritime law or state law and leave only claims arising under the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 ("OPA") in the litigation.First, the court ruled that admiralty jurisdiction is present because the alleged tortious conduct of the defendants occurred upon navigable waters of the Gulf of Mexico, disrupted maritime commerce, and the operations of the vessel bore a substantial relationship to traditional maritime activity. The term "vessel" is broadly construed ...
Read moreDetails