The Swedish P&I Club has issued alert to advise on how to mitigate legal risks when purchasing bunkers.
The Club refers to lessons learned from the OW Bunker & Trading A/S filed collapse which showed that there are significant risks for shipowners and charterers in using intermediaries for the supply of bunkers. On the one hand the intermediary issues an invoice in capacity as the contractual supplier and should be paid for the bunkers. On the other hand do physical suppliers in some jurisdictions have an independent right to claim the vessel for unpaid bunkers. As a result, there is an inherent risk for competing claims against vessels to the extent the intermediary fails to pass on the payment to the physical supplier.
The collapse of OW Bunker has not only generated disputes involving competing claims against vessel owners by contractual suppliers and physical suppliers, but also charterparty disputes between owners and charterers. The Club’s FD&D lawyers presently handle about 40 cases involving disputes following the collapse of OW Bunkers. The total sum of these disputes is in excess of USD 20 million. The legal issues are complex and case specific. For instance, it has been argued that OW Bunker or their assignees cannot claim payment at all under English law since they never owned the bunkers for which they issued an invoice. This argument was recently dismissed by the English Court of Appeal, see the Club’s Member Alert of 23 October 2015. In addition, a court decision in one country may not apply in another country. Therefore, as of today, no universal solution to the underlying dilemma with competing claims is in sight.
The OW Bunker collapse has generated important lessons for the future. Click here to view which steps the Club recommends to be taken by owners and charterers in order to bring contractual clarity in relation to the supply of bunkers, as well as mitigate the risk for competing claims.
Source: The Swedish P&I Club
