UCL & UMAS revealed in a report an increasing trend in international shipping emissions in stark contrast to IMO’s objectives to achieve absolute emission reductions of 20-30% by 2030, on 2008 emissions levels.
The report, released on 13 November by UCL and UMAS shows rising GHG emissions and slowing carbon intensity reductions in international shipping between 2018 to 2022.
The report study builds on the IMO’s Third and Fourth GHG Studies, of which both organisations are authors of, offering valuable insights into the sector’s response to global events and policy developments.
Furthermore, it highlights the interplay of factors influencing emissions trends in the container, oil tanker, bulk carrier and cruise segment, responsible for approximately 70% of the shipping sector’s emissions.
While some efficiency improvements are observed across various segments, the continued growth in transport work, despite the blip during the Covid-19 pandemic, necessitates further action to achieve ambitious emissions reduction targets set in the IMO’s Revised GHG strategy adopted last year.
The Covid-19 pandemic had a significant but transient impact on the trends observed. In 2020, the pandemic-induced reduction in trade led to a decrease in transport work and a subsequent reduction in total emissions.
However this trend was quickly reversed post-pandemic with a surge in trade in 2021 resulting in a spike in transport work, reduced efficiency, faster average speeds, consequently increasing overall emissions.
The IMO has imminent key decisions on both efficiency and energy policy in 2025. The message from this analysis is that the fleet actually has a latent efficiency opportunity – because during the period to 2022, utilisation and speeds of many ship categories actually trended in directions countering efficiency improvements.
…said Dr Tristan Smith, Professor of Energy and Transport, UCL Energy Institute.
He continued by stating that these are trends that can be rapidly reversed with minimal technological intervention and should also come with cost reductions to trade. The analysis also shows that market forces and weak regulation will not crystallise these potential efficiencies – increasing the stringency and efficacy of CII regulation will be key if 2022-2030 is to achieve the 20-30% GHG reductions committed to in IMO’s revised strategy.
Moreover, the low rate of carbon intensity/energy efficiency improvement (2012-2022) can be attributed to weak drivers of further efficiency after the initial efficiency ‘corrections’ on both ship speed and design in 2008-12.
Known market barriers and failures inhibiting business case and motivation for efficiency improvements and continue to leave many technical and operational efficiency measures under-used. The results also evidence the low efficacy of the EEDI regulation in driving fleet wide efficiency improvement.
The 2018-2022 period shows only a small increase in transport work and tonne nautical miles of ~ 1% p.a., significantly lower than ~ 3% p.a. growth observed in 2008-2018.
Similarly the trend in carbon intensity has slowed with an estimated 1.1% p.a. reduction 2018-2022, contrasting with higher average of ~ 3% improvements over the period 2008-2018.
The rapid efficiency improvements achieved in 2008-2012, including both operational improvements induced through slow steaming and technology improvements that such as ‘eco ships’ contributed technical efficiency gains, appear to have plateaued.
The absence of any driver beyond market forces and IMO’s EEDI regulation limited the incentive to go beyond the ‘lowest hanging fruit’ in efficiency. This implies that the CII regulation that entered into force in 2023 needs to have both stringency and enforcement to drive strong efficiency improvements in line with the IMO’s revised strategy, otherwise the efficiency opportunity will be left behind.
This analysis reveals a stagnation in emissions reductions from international shipping since 2018 and highlights the need for renewed efforts in fleet efficiency and carbon intensity improvements.
…said Dr Haydn Francis, Consultant, UMAS.
Dr Haydn Francis continued by commenting that while this can in part be attributed to the effects of COVID-19 on supply chains, there remains a clear need to focus on targeted strategies that address the varying trends across segments and support a cohesive path toward decarbonization.
