In an exclusive interview with SAFETY4SEA, during ICS’s 2019 Conference – Setting Course for 2050: Powering Global Trade, at LISW 2019, Guy Platten, Secretary General of ICS, provided his thoughts on the future of shipping and how IMO 2020 will affect it.
During the inaugural Hellenic American Maritime Forum in Athens, Dr. Khorshed Alam, COO, Viswa Group, talked about the sulphur 2020 options and alternatives, explaining how these solutions can be implemented, as well as what challenges are possible to occur.
During the 2019 SAFETY4SEA London Conference, Mr. Steve Esau, General Manager, SEA/LNG, provided an overview of the current LNG scene. He added that LNG can be a viable marine fuel, and it leads to significant environmental benefits. In addition, on a 10-year basis, LNG delivers a significantly higher ROI compared with open-loop scrubbers and it is a hands-down winner compared with low sulphur fuels.
During the 2019 SAFETY4SEA London Forum, Mr. Ian Adams, Executive Director, CSA2020, briefed on the drivers behind the Clean Shipping Alliance 2020 and why scrubbers are considered as a viable option to meet 2020 deadline.
Germany’s cabinet approved on March 27 a plan to facilitate LNG project companies to invest in new LNG terminals, under the country’s efforts to diversify its sources of gas. Namely, LNG companies will have to pay only a 10% share of the connection costs for LNG. Economy minister Peter Altmaier believes that it is key for the supply security of gas in Germany to use as many supply routes and sources as possible.
During the 219 SAFETY4SEA Cyprus Conference, Dr. John Kokarakis, Director Technical Business Development, HBSA Zone, Bureau Veritas, provided an in-depth overview of all the environmentally-friendly marine fuel solutions for compliance with the 2020 sulphur cap.
During the first SAFETY4SEA Conference in Singapore, Mr. Sean Hutchings, Chief Technical Officer, Thome Group of Companies, discussed what key environmental fuel options are available for operators to achieve compliance with the upcoming 2020 Sulphur cap and shared his experience on the hidden challenges surrounding each choice.
The GHG footprint of LNG is worse than this of the current conventional fuels, argues Mr. Panos Zachariadis, Technical Director of Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management. With this respect, LNG should be viewed only as a SOx and NOx compliant fuel and those that invest in it ‘should proceed on these grounds’, he notes.
Faced with a decision with huge cost implications, shipowners are considering all options on how to tackle sulphur emissions. Although any possible delay was ruled out during IMO MEPC 71, industry stakeholders think that a postponement of the 2020 deadline is possible, likewise the time extension of the BWM Convention.
Ahead of the 2020 sulphur cap, ship operators and oil refiners are preparing for implementation. The oil refining industry has to ensure that sufficient quantities of compliant fuel will be able to be produced. But governments need to monitor this carefully to keep the supply of compliant fuel as tight as possible.
Port of Helsinki cargo throughput declines by 2% in 201923/01/2020
- Maritime Health
Potential problems arising due to the Coronavirus23/01/2020
China approves tax waiver for bunker fuel23/01/2020
UK MCA to use technology to monitor commercial fishing compliance to ILO 18823/01/2020
Tokyo MoU: Risks of improperly rigged pilot ladders23/01/2020
ICC teams up with Singapore boosting digitalization in commerce23/01/2020
Petrolesport berths to increase cargo handling capabilities23/01/2020
NPA updates synergy with Ogun on Olokola Deep Seaport project23/01/2020
Tokyo MoU: Risks of lifting slings with plastic sheathing on freefall lifeboats23/01/2020
Port of Rostock sees its first STS LNG bunkering23/01/2020