PMSA rejects the CAAP recommendations that rely on speculative technology and arbitrary dates without accommodation for the economic realities confronting the ports’ tenants and customers, who are all vital to maintaining a strong economy in Southern California.
“The CAAP, as drafted, seeks to transform the technology on the waterfront while ensuring basic operations do not evolve to meet changing demands,” said John McLaurin, president of the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association. “It claims to be both fuel and technology neutral but clearly favors one technology and one fuel to the exclusion of others.”
PMSA’s official comments focus on eight aspects of the CAAP:
- Competitiveness: The San Pedro Bay complex has experienced no growth (in total volumes) and negative growth (in market share) during the past decade – something no other major gateway has experienced. Give the CAAP’s estimated $14 billion price tag, PMSA asks that the CAAP be analyzed for its impact on competitiveness, develop a competitiveness goal and integrate the goal within the CAAP.
- Goals of the Plan: PMSA asks that port officials align the CAAP’s measures and not place unnecessary burdens that only delay and increase the costs of the needed emission reductions.
- Cargo-Handling Equipment: PMSA asks that the CAAP include a pathway for both ultra-low emission technologies and electrification options for achieving significant emissions reductions in a cost-effective manner.
- Universal Port Truck Appointment System and Mandatory Truck Turn Times: PMSA strongly requests that efficiency measures be removed from the CAAP and that the CAAP affirmatively recommend that these measures be further addressed under the Supply Chain Optimization forum.
- Expanded Shore Power: PMSA requests that the San Pedro Bay ports participate in the development of an amended atberth regulation that takes into account emission reduction, competitive and economic needs of the maritime industry, and that avoids cargo diversion.
- Vessel Speed Reduction Program: The draft CAAP proposes to eliminate the financial incentive associated with slowing down within 20 nm of the ports and focusing on incentivizing speed reduction for the full 40 nm. PMSA is concerned that eliminating the 20 nm incentive will not increase compliance for the 40 nm distance, and would instead recommend maintaining both sets of vehicle speed reduction incentives.
- Clean Ship Program: The CAAP proposes to collect higher fees on Tier 0 and Tier 1 vessels calling at San Pedro Bay. PMSA believes this would likely result in no real changes in emissions but higher costs for customers in the short-term and requests that this proposal be eliminated.
“The maritime industry is evolving and will look radically different in a decade. We encourage port staff to update the CAAP to reflect this reality,” added Mr McLaurin. “If the ports are going to require tenants and customers to spend tens of billions of dollars on new technology, they must provide greater certainty as to the economic and competitive impacts of their plan.”