On 25 July 2018, the Malta registered bulk carrier 'Shark' was underway on an Easterly course heading for the port of Ravenna, Italy. The autopilot was set on a course of 089°.
At around 0030, the OS sighted four small vessels on the port side, each of them showing a bright white light. Suspecting that they were fishing vessels, he informed the OOW.
The OOW reported that he had observed the fishing vessels’ navigation lights. The fishing vessels were also detected on the radar.
At 0055, the OOW started making changes to the course, about five degrees to starboard, to pass clear of the boats. A few minutes later, he returned the vessel’s heading back on 089°.
Soon after plotting Shark’s position on the paper chart at 0100, the OOW and his OS reported that they saw a fishing vessel, reflected by the light of the full-moon on the port bow, with no navigation lights.
The second mate swiftly changed the steering to manual and set the helm hard over to starboard. He also instructed the OS to run over to the port bridge wing to check whether the collision had been avoided.
Although the vessel had turned and reached a heading of 120.5°, her course over ground was 090°.
At 0105, Shark collided with the Algerian fishing vessel Mohamed Badry, 22 nm Southwest of Ile de la Galite, off the coast of Tunisia.
As a result of the collision, the fishing vessel foundered and one of the fishermen tragically lost his life.
- A close quarter situation developed to the extent that a collision could not be avoided;
- At the time of the accident, the fishing vessel Mohamed Badry was engaged in trawl fishing;
- Mohamed Badry was on the port side of Shark. Its radar trail indicated that she was making way through the water and in a crossing situation with Shark;
- It is likely that Mohamed Badry’s regulatory navigation lights were either obscured by her bright working lights, or intermittently visible due to the vessel’s movement;
- In all probability, the attention of the bridge look-outs on both Mohamed Badry and Shark was directed elsewhere;
- ARPA radar and compass bearings were not used to determine CPA, TCPA to fully appraise the developing situation and to determine the risk of collision.
During the course of the safety investigation, the company:
- issued a Circular Letter on the appropriate use of radar information;
- amended the ‘Navigation in Coastal Waters’ checklist to include the use of two radars at different ranges;
- issued directions to its Compliance Department to discuss the accident during onboard visits.
Explore more herebelow: