–
Looking at port-side communities around the globe, which came first, the community or the port? The answer is that they likely grew together, but the most important question is what can be done to alleviate the air pollution that is growing with the rise of trade and smothering these portside communities? Fortunately much can be done to mitigate the severe health, air pollution and quality of life impactsof industrial shipping. Many major ports worldwide have led the way with technology innovations and investments in cleaner equipment.
The impacts of pollution
Each container full of goods going in and out of a port has a plume of sooty pollution associated with it, from all the trucks, trains, ships and cranes that handled it. In the US alone, more than13 million people – 3.5 million of whom are children – live near major marineports or rail yards, in close proximity to all those polluting containers1Health impacts related to diesel powered freight, mainly due to very fine particulate matter or soot, include increased rates of respiratory illness and asthma, cardiovascular disease,heart attacks, strokes, emergency room visits, and premature death2 Pollution from transportation sources has also been linked to birth defects, low birth weights, and premature births3 .Further,emerging studies have shown a potential connection between exposure to fine PM and diabetes, as well as cognitive decline and other serious impacts to the brain4 When we wrote about pollution from the shipping industry in our Harbouring Pollution series of reports in 2004, very little had been done at American ports to address air pollution and health impacts from ocean-going vessels, cargo equipment, locomotives and trucks moving our goods5.By 2006 however, the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach had adopted an expansive Clean Air Action Plan and the California Air Resources Board adopted a state-wide Goods Movement Emissions Reduction Plan6 Our new Clean Cargo toolkits detail these plans and other clean up measures that have been put in place at ports and other elements of the freight system7
What does it take to become a clean port?
Marine ports need to demonstrate a real commitment to reducing greenhouse gases, soot, smog-forming and toxic pollution, as well as minimising impactson nearby residents. See below for a summary of clean port measures. All of the measures that were commend are already in place at one or more major ports or freight facilities, some are mandated by regulation or soon to be,while others are embraced by green leaders.
Clean Port Measures
|
Who is setting an example in green shipping?
While the ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and Rotterdam have all made significant strides in reducing pollution and are known the world over as leaders, some impacts still remain. Other lesser known efforts also deserve attention.The Port of Los Angeles, Long Beach,Oakland, New York/ New Jersey, Houston, Charleston, and Seattle all have clean truck programmes8 The Port of Los Angeles has been operating and testing 18 zero emission plug-in and fuel-cell trucks.
Maersk, the largest shipping line,switched from dirty bunker fuel to cleaner low-sulphur marine fuel along selected routes in 20069 The company has also significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions by investing in larger ships that can carry more containers and operate more efficiently at lower speeds. These ships also include improved engine and hull designs and waste-heat recovery to boost environmental performance.
The US Navy utilises shore power atports of call all over the world, allowing it to power down the diesel engines onboard its ships while they are docked10 Some eighteen commercial ports in Europe and the US currently offer shorebased power for ships and that number is growing11 Ports in Japan and Hong Kong have also expressed interest in shorepower for ships12
Use of on-dock rail at ports is growing. For example, the Pusan Newport International Terminal in Busan, South Korea, opened such a facility in late 201013 Battery-powered, automated guidedvehicles (AGV) are being used at the Portsof Singapore and Rotterdam– the Port of Long Beach is also currently adding these.14These vehicles can shuttle containers around a yard for 12 hours on a battery pack, which can be switched out easily.15
Other good examples
In 2008, Helsinki, Finland moved its port to a site two kilometres from the nearest residential areas, to protect the local communities from air pollution, noise, and vibration and to address other environmental impacts16The port implemented other noteworthy practices such as: requiring overnight vessels to dock at berths located farthest from housing; using shore power for all passenger and car ferries; and tunnelling some segments of the road and rail lines underground to protect sensitive natural habitat. The port is now close to major transportation connections, reducing congestion and eliminating unnecessary transport miles17 The Port of Shanghai has made significant efforts to green its operations, including moving some terminals, retrofitting 131 rubber tyred gantry (RTG) cranes with electric motors, creating an emissions inventory, and investigating and testing shore power use18
In conclusion These are all impressive measures. For the millions of people living in close proximity to major marine ports, however, these types of measures are an urgent necessity for protecting their communities from harmful air pollution, associated health impacts and serious impairments to their quality of life. Most large ports are major economic power-houses providing an important source of jobs to the region. These jobs are valuable, but neighbouring communities cannot continue to subsidise the cost of freight by absorbing the pollution impacts of outdated and dirty shipping equipment. All major ports must increase investments in cleaner, modern equipment and practices in support of a healthy and safe region. |
Diane Bailey
Senior Scientist, Natural Resources Defence Council (NRDC), San Francisco, California, United States of America
Above article has been initially published at Port Technology International (Edition 59) and is reproduced here with author’s kind permission
References
|