Subscribe to our Mailing Lists (It's free!)
Friday, May 30, 2025
SAFETY4SEA
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    schedule

    A testing & inspection schedule for fire protection equipment onboard

    lessons learned

    Lessons learned: Ensure worksite is left safe for other users

    fire protection equipment

    Onboard inspections: 13 fire protection equipment items to check annually

    Yet another commercial vessel gets attacked in the Red Sea

    Russian seafarers evacuated from oil tanker in Yemen

  • SEAFiT
    • All
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
    culture of respect

    Addressing crew shortage: Establish clear expectations for respectful and professional behaviour

    Book Review: Building leaders the MMMA way

    Book Review: How to avoid a climate disaster

    mental health

    MOL takes step to enhance the mental health of its crew

    Book Review: Building leaders the MMMA way

    Book Review: The Art Of War

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    biofuels

    Rystad Energy: Biofuel supply is not keeping up with demand

    green shipping recycling

    Asian Shipowners show commitment to HKC compliance

    South Korea electric vessel standards

    South Korea updates electric vessel standards

    Rotor Sails

    Norsepower to equip six newbuild tankers with Rotor Sails

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    AI critical thinking

    Shaping the future: Critical thinking in the age of machines

    MASS

    LR: MASS safety hinges on clearly defined operational boundaries

    ammonia

    Companies shake hands to digitalize ammonia bunkering

    digitalization

    New dataset aligned with IMO Compendium post-FAL 49

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
    NCL Salten

    Inspection onboard NCL Salten reveals deficiencies

    India monsoon

    India: Mooring and anchoring during the Monsoon season

    hull

    Libya mandates underwater hull inspections

    Indian Ocean MoU Annual report

    Indian Ocean MoU PSC Annual Report 2024

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    Singapore maritime

    Singapore and France ink agreement for various maritime projects

    schedule

    A testing & inspection schedule for fire protection equipment onboard

    fire protection equipment

    Onboard inspections: 13 fire protection equipment items to check annually

    tariffs Trump

    U.S. appeals court restores President Trump’s tariffs

  • Columns
    seafarers

    Leading from every position: Building a culture of proactive seafarers

    fuels

    Fuel pathways to net zero emissions

    green shipping

    Decarbonization and emission compliance through efficiency measures

    Trending Tags

    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    schedule

    A testing & inspection schedule for fire protection equipment onboard

    lessons learned

    Lessons learned: Ensure worksite is left safe for other users

    fire protection equipment

    Onboard inspections: 13 fire protection equipment items to check annually

    Yet another commercial vessel gets attacked in the Red Sea

    Russian seafarers evacuated from oil tanker in Yemen

  • SEAFiT
    • All
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
    culture of respect

    Addressing crew shortage: Establish clear expectations for respectful and professional behaviour

    Book Review: Building leaders the MMMA way

    Book Review: How to avoid a climate disaster

    mental health

    MOL takes step to enhance the mental health of its crew

    Book Review: Building leaders the MMMA way

    Book Review: The Art Of War

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    biofuels

    Rystad Energy: Biofuel supply is not keeping up with demand

    green shipping recycling

    Asian Shipowners show commitment to HKC compliance

    South Korea electric vessel standards

    South Korea updates electric vessel standards

    Rotor Sails

    Norsepower to equip six newbuild tankers with Rotor Sails

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    AI critical thinking

    Shaping the future: Critical thinking in the age of machines

    MASS

    LR: MASS safety hinges on clearly defined operational boundaries

    ammonia

    Companies shake hands to digitalize ammonia bunkering

    digitalization

    New dataset aligned with IMO Compendium post-FAL 49

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
    NCL Salten

    Inspection onboard NCL Salten reveals deficiencies

    India monsoon

    India: Mooring and anchoring during the Monsoon season

    hull

    Libya mandates underwater hull inspections

    Indian Ocean MoU Annual report

    Indian Ocean MoU PSC Annual Report 2024

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    Singapore maritime

    Singapore and France ink agreement for various maritime projects

    schedule

    A testing & inspection schedule for fire protection equipment onboard

    fire protection equipment

    Onboard inspections: 13 fire protection equipment items to check annually

    tariffs Trump

    U.S. appeals court restores President Trump’s tariffs

  • Columns
    seafarers

    Leading from every position: Building a culture of proactive seafarers

    fuels

    Fuel pathways to net zero emissions

    green shipping

    Decarbonization and emission compliance through efficiency measures

    Trending Tags

    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
SAFETY4SEA

For global warming, LNG is worse than conventional liquid fuels

by Panos Zachariadis
June 29, 2018
in Fuels, Opinions
papua new guinea

Above image is used for illustration purposes only

FacebookTwitterEmailLinkedin

The GHG footprint of LNG is worse than this of the current conventional fuels, argues Mr. Panos Zachariadis, Technical Director of Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management. With this respect, LNG should be viewed only as a SOx and NOx compliant fuel and those that invest in it ‘should proceed on these grounds’, he noted.

LNG as marine fuel can comply with the new IMO requirements for sulfur oxides and NOx tier III emissions without the use of messy scrubbers and NOx reducing catalysts, both of which immensely increase the size and complexity of ships’ engine-rooms as well as the crews’ workloads.  Not to mention the nasty inputs (e.g. urea) and outputs involved. However, with regards to its global warming effect, LNG -knowingly or not- has been credited with Global Warming reducing capability which is simply false. There are enough inconvenient truths in the maritime regulations already, but this one is the most important of all: it relates to our continued survival.

I submit the stakes are higher with LNG and those of us who “know” should stop pretending, while those that don’t should educate themselves. Most have heard the claim that LNG shipboard use as fuel results in “about 20-25% less CO2” and that methane is, pound for pound, 25 times worse than CO2 in warming the atmosphere. Well, none of the previous two figures is really accurate.  LNG is 95-98% methane, a very potent greenhouse gas. How potent? If we look toward a 100 year future time span, LNG is 34 times worse than CO2 (not just 25 times)*. But 100 years is erroneously used in this case. That time horizon started being used because this is the lifespan of CO2 in the atmosphere. But this is irrelevant. We should care what LNG does to the atmosphere for the next few years. Plus, our global warming problem is much more urgent than the next 100 years. So here are the global warming numbers, pound for pound emitted today, for the next 5, 10 and 20 years: LNG is respectively 116, 110 and 86 times worse than CO2 in warming the planet!

Most engine makers’ tests suggest that, if the engine is operating perfectly, 11% less CO2 should be assumed for the combustion phase only. But no engine can ever operate perfectly. Perfect combustion exists only in chemistry text books. Thus small unburned quantities of LNG escape together with the exhaust gasses to the atmosphere (for spark-ignited engines the unburned quantities are so substantial as to immediately render these engines worse than conventional liquid fuel engines, even using the 25 “worse” factor). New high pressure combustion engines are said to have minute amounts of “methane leak”. However, when the proper factors of 110 or 86 are used, even a leak of one or two grams per Kwh brings these “state-of-the-art engines” at par or worse than conventional engines. But these leaks during combustion are the least of our problems. We have to add leaks before the engine, from the tanks, during bunkering, during transportation of LNG from source to consumer, and during extraction which, currently, are all excluded or severely understated from a proper global warming assessment. These leaks invariably occur (there is no way to eliminate them) and they are huge.

RelatedNews

Leading from every position: Building a culture of proactive seafarers

Fuel pathways to net zero emissions

The studies start piling up saying that LNG’s global warming effect is worse than that of liquid fuels and may even be worse than that of coal! Most experts say that if methane slip from the whole LNG cycle (extraction to combustion) exceeds 3%, then LNG is worse than coal in global warming effect!  And, unfortunately, detailed measurements in the US have shown an overall average of 3.6 – 7.9% leaks in the extraction fields (some being as high as 11% – Utah basin, and 17% (!) – Los Angeles basin).  We are talking measured data by scientists including EPA’s data, not the claims of producers ( which hover in the 1-2 % range).  Arguably the US’ shale gas involves more methane leak than conventional gas fields (which are estimated at 4-6% leaks), however in other countries the leaks downstream (during liquefaction, transportation and use) are recorded higher. In all cases the leaks are huge, rendering LNG a very potent Global Warming gas which has been under-estimated.

The global LNG yearly production is about 2.5 billion tons. Even assuming just 4% leak (much lower than many studies) multiplied by 86, gives almost 9 billion tons CO2e which is currently largely unaccounted for or hugely underestimated. And it will be increasing as LNG is becoming more popular, being touted as a “transitional” fuel (transitional to what?). To put it in perspective, remember that the total man-made CO2 which we are trying desperately to reduce is assumed at 36 billion tons per year (of which about 0.8 tons due to shipping). Maybe our problem is really 25% bigger than we thought?

I mentioned earlier that the stakes are higher in the case of LNG than the other “inconvenient truths”. This is so both from the environmental point of view but also from the ship operators’ point of view.  It will be very unfair for IMO, and all others involved such as producers, classification societies, shipyards, consultants etc., to lead ship operators to believe that LNG results in reduced GHG footprint and, after the operators invest several millions to build or retrofit their ships to burn LNG, the cat gets out of the bag screaming “sorry, it’s not as clean as we had said”.

LNG should be viewed only as a SOx and NOx compliant fuel and those that invest in it should proceed on these grounds, or on its projected future price vs liquid fuels, and not on the myth of reduced GHG effects. As far as GHG, it cannot be considered either as transitional or short term “solution”. The LNG GHG footprint is clearly worse than current conventional fuels (e.g. marine diesel, de-sulfurized fuel etc.) Methane should be viewed as a bigger and more urgent problem than CO2.

Unfortunately other “alternative” fuels are not much better. 95% of our hydrogen production currently comes from LNG. Water electrolysis requires large amounts of energy (55 kwh per kilo of hydrogen) resulting in 49 kg CO2 emissions for each kilo H2 produced. Only if this energy comes from renewable sources can hydrogen be considered “clean”, but we are far from having so much renewable energy capacity. Methanol comes from LNG. Ammonia comes from hydrogen. LPG (propane/butane) is a small (1-5%) by-product of LNG production or crude oil refining – not nearly enough to replace current fuels. Biofuels? Very controversial and, in any case, not sufficient to make a dent. To reduce GHG we need new technology (better batteries, synthetic fuels etc.) Until then, our current conventional liquid fuels have -by far- the smallest GHG footprint of all “alternatives”.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of SAFETY4SEA and are for information sharing and discussion purposes only.


About Panos Zachariadis, Technical Director, Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management

For global warming, LNG is worse than conventional liquid fuelsPanos Zachariadis is Technical Director of Atlantic Bulk Carriers Management Ltd since 1997. From 1984 to 1997 he was Marine Superintendent in the company’s New York office. His shipping experience spans diverse areas including sea service in bulk carriers and oil tankers, dry dock repairs, new building supervision and specifications, ship operations and chartering. He holds a MSE degree in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the University of Michigan. He has been attending IMO since 2004 as a member of the Greek delegation. He was extensively involved with IMO’s Goal Based Standards and the Greek study which reversed the IMO decision to make double hull bulk carriers mandatory. He was also instrumental in developing the new IMO coating standard (PSPC) for all ships’ ballast tanks. Currently he is involved in the new IMO environmental regulations for ships. He has written numerous technical guides, papers and articles and has been awarded the 2011 Efkranti Shipping Personality award for promoting Greek Shipping internationally. Member of Hellenic Chamber of Shipping and UGS technical committees, BIMCO Marine Committee, ABS European Technical Committee, BOD HELMEPA and MARTECMA.

For global warming, LNG is worse than conventional liquid fuelsFor global warming, LNG is worse than conventional liquid fuels
For global warming, LNG is worse than conventional liquid fuelsFor global warming, LNG is worse than conventional liquid fuels
Tags: alternative fuelsbiofuelsGHGglobal warmingSAFETY4SEA
Previous Post

IMO workshop addresses marine litters in oceans

Next Post

Watch: Arctic sea ice continues a trend of shrinking maximum extents

Panos Zachariadis

Panos Zachariadis

Panos Zachariadis is a Mechanical Engineer (BSc) and Naval Architect (MSE) from the University of Michigan with a 38-year experience in shipping. He has served for years as Marine Superintendent in New York, after periods of shipbuilding supervision in Japan and sea service in bulk carriers and oil tankers. He is Technical Director of Atlantic Bulk Carriers since 1997 and a member of the Greek Delegation to IMO since 2004, having contributed to the development of several well-known regulations (e.g. GBS, PSPC, FSA) and the prevention of others (e.g. double hull bulk carriers). In cooperation with major Korean shipyards he has applied numerous energy saving ideas, some of which have become industry standards. He is a member of Technical Committees of several classification societies, UGS and Hellenic Chamber of Shipping, BIMCO Marine Committee, BoD HELMEPA and MARTECMA. He has been honored with the 2011 Efkranti award for his contribution to Greek shipping, the Hellenic Shortsea Shipowners Association 2017 Maritime Personality award, the 2017 Lloyd’s List “Achievement in Safety or Environmental Protection” award and the 2019 Green4Sea Personality Award.

Related News

biofuels
Fuels

Rystad Energy: Biofuel supply is not keeping up with demand

May 30, 2025
green shipping
Opinions

Decarbonization and emission compliance through efficiency measures

May 30, 2025
New deal sees to marine biofuels supply in the Canary Islands
Fuels

New deal sees to marine biofuels supply in the Canary Islands

May 30, 2025
ammonia
Fuels

Companies shake hands to digitalize ammonia bunkering

May 30, 2025
Distillate fuels: The ‘trouble-free’ marine fuel?
Fuels

Distillate fuels: The ‘trouble-free’ marine fuel?

May 30, 2025
wellness crew
Opinions

A thriving crew means a thriving industry

May 29, 2025

Comments 2

  1. Nikos Xydas says:
    7 years ago

    LPG (propane/butane) may be a small (1-5%) by-product of LNG production or crude oil refining and not nearly enough to replace current fuels (certainly not all), but to replace selectively some uses eg as fuel in all LPG carriers to start with, can be ideal (not excluding also other selective uses). LPG is available everywhere in the world, infrastructure is very mature, bunkering can be developed much easier, equipment more economical to install, simpler non-cryogenic technology etc.etc.
    And most importantly in relation also with the article, while providing all the advantages of LPG, LPG is not a greenhouse gas (GHG) it does not experience methane slip and any release/leak to the atmosphere has no global warming effects.
    LPG is an ideal fuel as a solution to IMO2020 regulations and also much better suited to the IMO2050 GHG strategy.

    Reply
  2. Andreas Schmid says:
    7 years ago

    Dear Mr Zachariadis,
    Many thanks for your overview.
    Could you please note the sources where to find this data. Especially the comparison between the LNG and coal food print would be interesting to see, and the measurements from the scientist and EPA, regarding the Methane slip on the fields.

    Best regards,
    Dr. Andreas Schmid

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore more

No Result
View All Result
MARITIME EVENTS

Explore

  • Safety
  • SEAFiT
  • Green
  • Smart
  • Risk
  • Others
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

Useful Links

  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policies
  • Advertising
  • Content Marketing
  • Contact

© 2025 SAFETY4SEA

No Result
View All Result
  • Safety
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
  • SEAFiT
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
  • Green
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
  • Smart
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
  • Risk
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Case Studies
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
  • Others
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
  • Columns
    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Opinions
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Tip of the day
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

© 2025 SAFETY4SEA

Manage your privacy
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Manage options
{title} {title} {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Safety
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
  • SEAFiT
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
  • Green
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
  • Smart
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
  • Risk
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Case Studies
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
  • Others
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
  • Columns
    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Human Performance
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Opinions
    • Regulatory Update
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Tip of the day
    • Training & Development
    • Wellness Corner
    • Wellness Tips
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

© 2025 SAFETY4SEA