Subscribe to our Mailing Lists (It's free!)
Saturday, June 10, 2023
SAFETY4SEA
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    NTSB Investigation

    Lessons learned: Loss of redundancy in diving bell launch and recovery PLC system

    Lessons learned: Steam and water released from filter

    Lessons learned: Disposable vape self-ignition

    maritime mental health

    Seafarers Happiness Index 2023Q1: Seafarers are unsatisfied with onboard fitness and health benefits

    Cargo fires: An issue that needs to be tackled

    Cargo fires: An issue that needs to be tackled

  • SEAFiT
    • All
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
    Book Review: A role model for ship managers

    Book review: The politics of sustainability in the Arctic

    contemplation as a spiritual practice

    Contemplation: Directing the mind towards what’s important

    power of hug

    The power of hugging: How it affects our health

    Impostor Syndrome

    Mental Health Focus: How to deal with Impostor Syndrome

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    HHI wins AiP from KR for tank shape optimized for liquefied fuels

    HHI wins AiP from KR for tank shape optimized for liquefied fuels

    Four major parties to assess emissions throughout the life cycle of LNG carrier

    Four major parties to assess emissions throughout the life cycle of LNG carrier

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    USA law

    U.S. Senators introduce legislation to eliminate in-port ship emissions

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    Cyber security: What it means for the shipping industry

    Cyber security: What it means for the shipping industry

    DNV Maritime Cyber Priority 2023: Shipping faces 5 major cyber security challenges

    DNV Maritime Cyber Priority 2023: Shipping faces 5 major cyber security challenges

    New Mission to Seafarers app strengthens welfare support

    New Mission to Seafarers app strengthens welfare support

    ABS awards AIP to SHI for structural health monitoring system

    ABS awards AIP to SHI for structural health monitoring system

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Case Studies
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
    AMSA bans second vessel in a week

    AMSA bans second vessel in a week

    Ship detentions in Paris MoU in February 2021

    AMSA bans bulk carrier Babuza Wisdom for 90 days

    tanker arrested in singapore

    AMSA convicts master and company after pilot ladder injury

    amsa planned maintenance fic

    OCIMF Annual Report 2023: Key amendments and additions under SIRE 2.0

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    baltic exchange

    Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 5 – 9 June

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    StenaRoRo’s ESG reporting making leaps due to Mercy Ships partnership

    StenaRoRo’s ESG reporting making leaps due to Mercy Ships partnership

    IWSA opens voting for “Wind Ship – the Future” poster design contest

    IWSA opens voting for “Wind Ship – the Future” poster design contest

  • Columns
    The tides are changing at Alang

    The tides are changing at Alang

    Ship recycling: A solution for plastic pollution and environmental protection

    Ship recycling: A solution for plastic pollution and environmental protection

    Back To The Future: How Rotor Sails are now a credible option to tackle climate challenge

    Back To The Future: How Rotor Sails are now a credible option to tackle climate challenge

    Trending Tags

    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Wellness Corner
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    NTSB Investigation

    Lessons learned: Loss of redundancy in diving bell launch and recovery PLC system

    Lessons learned: Steam and water released from filter

    Lessons learned: Disposable vape self-ignition

    maritime mental health

    Seafarers Happiness Index 2023Q1: Seafarers are unsatisfied with onboard fitness and health benefits

    Cargo fires: An issue that needs to be tackled

    Cargo fires: An issue that needs to be tackled

  • SEAFiT
    • All
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
    Book Review: A role model for ship managers

    Book review: The politics of sustainability in the Arctic

    contemplation as a spiritual practice

    Contemplation: Directing the mind towards what’s important

    power of hug

    The power of hugging: How it affects our health

    Impostor Syndrome

    Mental Health Focus: How to deal with Impostor Syndrome

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    HHI wins AiP from KR for tank shape optimized for liquefied fuels

    HHI wins AiP from KR for tank shape optimized for liquefied fuels

    Four major parties to assess emissions throughout the life cycle of LNG carrier

    Four major parties to assess emissions throughout the life cycle of LNG carrier

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    USA law

    U.S. Senators introduce legislation to eliminate in-port ship emissions

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    Cyber security: What it means for the shipping industry

    Cyber security: What it means for the shipping industry

    DNV Maritime Cyber Priority 2023: Shipping faces 5 major cyber security challenges

    DNV Maritime Cyber Priority 2023: Shipping faces 5 major cyber security challenges

    New Mission to Seafarers app strengthens welfare support

    New Mission to Seafarers app strengthens welfare support

    ABS awards AIP to SHI for structural health monitoring system

    ABS awards AIP to SHI for structural health monitoring system

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Case Studies
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
    AMSA bans second vessel in a week

    AMSA bans second vessel in a week

    Ship detentions in Paris MoU in February 2021

    AMSA bans bulk carrier Babuza Wisdom for 90 days

    tanker arrested in singapore

    AMSA convicts master and company after pilot ladder injury

    amsa planned maintenance fic

    OCIMF Annual Report 2023: Key amendments and additions under SIRE 2.0

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    baltic exchange

    Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 5 – 9 June

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    Port of Klaipeda and Proman shake hands on methanol bunkering

    StenaRoRo’s ESG reporting making leaps due to Mercy Ships partnership

    StenaRoRo’s ESG reporting making leaps due to Mercy Ships partnership

    IWSA opens voting for “Wind Ship – the Future” poster design contest

    IWSA opens voting for “Wind Ship – the Future” poster design contest

  • Columns
    The tides are changing at Alang

    The tides are changing at Alang

    Ship recycling: A solution for plastic pollution and environmental protection

    Ship recycling: A solution for plastic pollution and environmental protection

    Back To The Future: How Rotor Sails are now a credible option to tackle climate challenge

    Back To The Future: How Rotor Sails are now a credible option to tackle climate challenge

    Trending Tags

    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Wellness Corner
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
SAFETY4SEA

USCG: Lessons learned from El Faro tragedy

by Rear Admiral John Nadeau
September 10, 2018
in Accidents, Opinions
el faro
FacebookTwitterEmailLinkedin

In the aftermath of El Faro casualty, Rear Admiral John P. Nadeau, Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy, US Coast Guard, highlights that the adoption of a proactive safety culture, remains the number one priority. Lessons learned from this tragedy shed light to the importance of incorporating contingency planning into SMS, including also heavy weather conditions. RADM Nadeau provides an overview of the investigation, highlighting key aspects of voyage planning and operations for enhanced safety at sea.

 

SAFETY4SEA:  What safety challenges did the El Faro accident unveil in promoting a safer operating environment onboard? What needs to be done further from both operators’ side and USCG’s response?

RADM Nadeau: The loss of the El Faro and all 33 persons aboard was a tragic and preventable accident.  While the primary cause of the casualty was the decision to navigate in close proximity to a Category 3 hurricane, there were other contributing factors.  These include:

RelatedNews

Lessons learned: Loss of redundancy in diving bell launch and recovery PLC system

Lessons learned: Disposable vape self-ignition

  1. the failure of operating company to maintain an effective safety management system;
  2. the failure of the Recognized Organization to uncover or otherwise resolve longstanding deficiencies that adversely affected the safety and seaworthiness; and
  3. the failure of the USCG to properly oversee the work conducted by the Recognized Organization on our behalf.

The investigation noted numerous failures on the part of the operating company to properly fulfill its obligations under the ISM Code. Most relevant to this casualty was the company’s failure to provide the necessary shoreside support for the master to perform his duties safely. The overriding authority of the master does not absolve a company of its obligation under the ISM Code to provide such support.  The findings also showed that the USCG failed to adequately oversee the Recognized Organization.  As the lead agency of the U.S. Flag Administration, the USCG is ultimately responsible to monitor the performance of Recognized Organizations that perform delegated functions on U.S. flag vessels.

 

S4S: Which were the challenges during El Faro’s accident investigation? Are there any differences in the recommendations suggested by USCG and NTSB? 

RADM Nadeau: The USCG Marine Board of Investigation (MBI) and NTSB worked closely together to gather and share all evidence, then each agency conducted its own analysis, developed independent conclusions, and authored separate reports. Although specific recommendations between the USCG MBI and NTSB may vary, the goal of both investigations was to determine the causal factors and make safety recommendations so that a tragedy of this magnitude never happens again. The USCG MBI and NTSB found many similar conclusions regarding the underlying systemic challenges in the safety framework. Locating the sunken vessel in 15,000 feet of water and the subsequent recovery of the voyage data recorder presented unique technical challenges. The NTSB and US Navy demonstrated amazing capabilities that enabled recovery of the VDR, which greatly improved the understanding of the timeline, decisions, and conditions onboard the vessel when the tragedy occurred.

 

Always ensure your officers and crew have the most current and accurate weather information available.

S4S: In the aftermath of the accident, what are your thoughts regarding effective leadership onboard and ashore in an emergency situations? How can the industry do the extra mile and cultivate strong safety culture in order to prevent similar incidents in the future?

RADM Nadeau: I believe the role of the regulator is to ensure that the operator has systems in place to optimize safety performance. However, regulatory compliance, by itself, is not sufficient to create and sustain a healthy safety culture.  Each company and operator is different and must determine what their unique safety culture needs and what behaviors are critical to sustain such a culture.  Simply adopting generic checklists and placing some general “off the shelf” SMS manuals in the master’s office is not enough.  Senior leadership must be engaged and create an environment where safety culture can thrive.  Constant focus on productivity or expenses, rather than safety performance, sends a message that safety is less important, too expensive, or someone else’s responsibility and simply achieved by minimum compliance with prescriptive regulations.  A robust safety culture permeates all element of the entire company and must flow from the very top to the bottom – from the boardroom and shoreside management, all the way down to the port engineers, vessel master and the most junior crewmembers.

 

S4S: Given that El Faro’s USCG investigation brought light to several challenges in the industry’s safety framework, how is the accident expected to be a catalyst for change? 

RADM Nadeau: This is a call to action for the entire maritime community.  The El Faro casualty was the result of poor seamanship compounded by a failure of the safety framework that should have triggered a series of corrective actions that likely would have prevented it.  We all can, and must, learn from this tragedy.  Seafarers, supporting shoreside personnel, operating companies, Recognized Organizations, and flag states must act with a sense of urgency to ensure a robust, effective safety framework. We should all honestly assess our own safety management and oversight responsibilities and ask ourselves if we’ve truly adopted a safety mindset and seek continuous improvement, or if we’re simply doing the minimum necessary to maintain compliance.

 

S4S: Do you plan any changes/ improvements in USCG’s organization/ procedures/ policies/ training following the lessons learned from El Faro accident?

RADM Nadeau: As stated by the Commandant of the USCG in the Final Action Memo, we must, and will, improve our oversight of Recognized Organizations – those organizations that we entrust to act on our behalf.  We are making changes to insure better visibility of RO decisions and improve our processes to track RO performance. We are modifying our organizational structure at Headquarters, revising our policy, creating new processes, and improving training with an emphasis on auditing skills.  Third parties are fundamental to the current safety framework and provide outstanding capabilities.  But as the Flag Administration and final element in the safety net, the USCG must maintain adequate oversight of all delegated functions, including those Safety Management System verification functions that are conducted on our behalf by our ROs.

 

The El Faro casualty was the result of poor seamanship compounded by a failure of the safety framework that should have triggered a series of corrective actions.

S4S: Considering the USCG safety recommendations with respect to El Faro accident, should we expect any regulatory updates or best practice developments in the near future?

RADM Nadeau: The Coast Guard is working with Congress, industry, and Federal partners on regulatory, legislative, and non-regulatory solutions to address the safety recommendations related to high water alarms, periodic dead weight surveys, and marine weather forecasting.

 

S4S: What are your suggestions to industry stakeholders to enhance the safety of operations onboard in case of heavy weather conditions? How could we prevent similar incidents in the future?

RADM Nadeau: First and foremost, no matter where you are in your organization, adopt and promote a proactive safety culture.  Incorporate contingency planning and exercises, to include those associated with heavy weather conditions, into your safety management system.  Ensure everyone ashore and aboard the vessel understands their authorities and responsibilities during an emergency, as well as the capabilities and limitations of the vessel, its machinery, and lifesaving equipment.  Today, instantaneous availability of real-time information, coupled with reliable worldwide communications capability, give shoreside management the ability to support key aspects of voyage planning and operations.  Ensure your officers and crew have the most current and accurate weather information available and know how, and when, to engage the designated person ashore. Finally, ensure all lifesaving and emergency equipment on board is in good repair and functioning properly.

 


 

About Rear Admiral John P. Nadeau, Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy, U.S. Coast Guard

Rear Admiral John Nadeau assumed the duties as the Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy in July of 2017. In this capacity, he leads development of national policy, standards, and programs to promote Marine Safety, Security and Environmental Stewardship. He oversees three Directorates: Inspections and Compliance, Marine Transportation Systems, and Commercial Regulations and Standards. The programs under his leadership include waterways management, navigation and boating safety, ports and facilities, merchant mariner credentialing, vessel documentation, marine casualty investigation, commercial vessel inspections, and port state control.

His previous flag officer assignment was the Assistant Commandant for Capability, where he was responsible for identifying and providing service-wide capabilities and developing standards for staffing, training, equipping, sustaining, maintaining, and employing forces to meet all U.S. Coast Guard mission requirements.

Other assignments include Commanding Officer of the Coast Guard Marine Safety Center; Commanding Officer of Marine Safety Unit Wilmington, North Carolina, where he served as the Captain of the Port, Federal On Scene Coordinator, and Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection; Chief of Inspections at Marine Safety Office Corpus Christi, Texas; Senior Investigating Officer at Activities Baltimore, Maryland; and Chief of the Office of Design and Engineering Standards at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters.

A native of Saco, Maine, Rear Admiral Nadeau graduated from the U.S. Coast Guard Academy with a Bachelor of Science degree in Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering and obtained advanced degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering from the University of Michigan. He earned a Master of Arts degree in Homeland Security and Defense from the Naval Postgraduate School and is licensed as a Professional Engineer in Virginia.

His military awards include the Legion of Merit, Meritorious Service Medal, the Coast Guard Commendation Medal, the Coast Guard Achievement Medal, the Army Achievement Medal, and the Transportation 9/11 Medal.

 

 

The views presented hereabove are only those of the author and not necessarily those of  SAFETY4SEA and are for information sharing and discussion  purposes only.

Tags: El Faroincident investigationInterviewslessons learnedUSCG
Rear Admiral John Nadeau

Rear Admiral John Nadeau

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

NTSB Investigation

Lessons learned: Loss of redundancy in diving bell launch and recovery PLC system

June 9, 2023
baltic exchange

Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 5 – 9 June

June 9, 2023
MARITIME EVENTS

Explore

  • Safety
  • SEAFiT
  • Green
  • Smart
  • Risk
  • Others
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

Useful Links

  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policies
  • Advertising
  • Contact

© 2021 SAFETY4SEA

No Result
View All Result
  • Safety
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
  • SEAFiT
    • Intellectual
    • Mental
    • Physical
    • Social
    • Spiritual
  • Green
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
  • Smart
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
  • Risk
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Case Studies
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
  • Others
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
  • Columns
    • Opinions
    • Book Review
    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Interviews
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
    • Wellness Corner
  • SAFETY4SEA Events
  • SAFETY4SEA Plus Subscription

© 2021 SAFETY4SEA

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Disclaimer.