Subscribe to our Mailing Lists (It's free!)
Wednesday, July 6, 2022
SAFETY4SEA
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    Lessons learned: Emphasizing the hazardous areas around a vessel reduces risks

    UK MAIB: Best practice when rigging pilot ladders

    Standard Club: Risks associated with the use of Y-splitters when carrying additional reefers

    Standard Club: Risks associated with the use of Y-splitters when carrying additional reefers

    recaap isc

    ReCAAP ISC: Two incidents of armed robbery against ships in Asia

    qingdao cleaning up of enteromorpha

    Navigation issues in Qingdao waters due to cleaning up of Enteromorpha

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    lng

    SGMF launches guidance on rules for filling and loading LNG fuel tanks

    New  EEXI, CII requirements effective from 2023: How to revise SEEMP

    New EEXI, CII requirements effective from 2023: How to revise SEEMP

    port of esbjerg

    Port Esbjerg to receive green hydrogen from 2023

    world’s first LNG dual fuel Suezmax tanker

    World’s first LNG dual fuel Suezmax tanker begins operations

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    sweden ai search and rescue

    Sweden uses AI to improve search and rescue operations

    maersk tankers

    Maersk Tankers launches new tool to help ships track their emissions

    mayflower autonomous ship

    Mayflower Autonomous Ship completes transatlantic voyage

    k line ai

    K Line to use AI to protect cyber security of ship-shore communication

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    Cargo Vessel Allegedly Carrying Stolen Ukrainian Grain

    Windward: Cargo ship allegedly carrying stolen Ukrainian grain potential indicator of “more brazen Russia”

    paris mou

    2021 Paris MoU Annual Report

    one misdeclared cargo

    ONE to implement penalty fee for misdeclared cargo

    master first officer fined

    Master, First Officer to pay $75,000 for compliance breach in Great Barrier Reef

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    port of esbjerg

    Port Esbjerg to receive green hydrogen from 2023

    europe hydrogen plant

    Europe’s largest green hydrogen plant to start operations in 2025

    imo voyage together

    Korea donates $2M to IMO for its “Voyage Together” fund

    Novorossiysk terminal

    Russian court decided to temporarily close Novorossiysk terminal

  • Columns
    UK Chamber of Shipping: Electrification will play a key role in the industry’s decarbonization

    UK Chamber of Shipping: Electrification will play a key role in the industry’s decarbonization

    fire onboard

    Examining Ro-Ro/-Pax, PCTC fires

    IMO: Digitalization paves the way for smarter and greener shipping

    IMO: Digitalization paves the way for smarter and greener shipping

    Trending Tags

    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    Lessons learned: Emphasizing the hazardous areas around a vessel reduces risks

    UK MAIB: Best practice when rigging pilot ladders

    Standard Club: Risks associated with the use of Y-splitters when carrying additional reefers

    Standard Club: Risks associated with the use of Y-splitters when carrying additional reefers

    recaap isc

    ReCAAP ISC: Two incidents of armed robbery against ships in Asia

    qingdao cleaning up of enteromorpha

    Navigation issues in Qingdao waters due to cleaning up of Enteromorpha

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    lng

    SGMF launches guidance on rules for filling and loading LNG fuel tanks

    New  EEXI, CII requirements effective from 2023: How to revise SEEMP

    New EEXI, CII requirements effective from 2023: How to revise SEEMP

    port of esbjerg

    Port Esbjerg to receive green hydrogen from 2023

    world’s first LNG dual fuel Suezmax tanker

    World’s first LNG dual fuel Suezmax tanker begins operations

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    sweden ai search and rescue

    Sweden uses AI to improve search and rescue operations

    maersk tankers

    Maersk Tankers launches new tool to help ships track their emissions

    mayflower autonomous ship

    Mayflower Autonomous Ship completes transatlantic voyage

    k line ai

    K Line to use AI to protect cyber security of ship-shore communication

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    Cargo Vessel Allegedly Carrying Stolen Ukrainian Grain

    Windward: Cargo ship allegedly carrying stolen Ukrainian grain potential indicator of “more brazen Russia”

    paris mou

    2021 Paris MoU Annual Report

    one misdeclared cargo

    ONE to implement penalty fee for misdeclared cargo

    master first officer fined

    Master, First Officer to pay $75,000 for compliance breach in Great Barrier Reef

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    port of esbjerg

    Port Esbjerg to receive green hydrogen from 2023

    europe hydrogen plant

    Europe’s largest green hydrogen plant to start operations in 2025

    imo voyage together

    Korea donates $2M to IMO for its “Voyage Together” fund

    Novorossiysk terminal

    Russian court decided to temporarily close Novorossiysk terminal

  • Columns
    UK Chamber of Shipping: Electrification will play a key role in the industry’s decarbonization

    UK Chamber of Shipping: Electrification will play a key role in the industry’s decarbonization

    fire onboard

    Examining Ro-Ro/-Pax, PCTC fires

    IMO: Digitalization paves the way for smarter and greener shipping

    IMO: Digitalization paves the way for smarter and greener shipping

    Trending Tags

    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
SAFETY4SEA

The SAFETY I vs SAFETY II debate

The Emperor has no clothes, says Dr. Dominic Cooper

by The Editorial Team
April 5, 2022
in Maritime Knowledge, Safety
The SAFETY I vs SAFETY II debate
FacebookTwitterEmailLinkedin

“Safety-II” or “Safety Differently” have made headlines in recent years as an evolutionary complement of the conventional safety thinking, referred to as ‘Safety I’. The new safety concept comes to dislodge the interest from ’what goes wrong’ to ‘what goes right’, reminding that safety management should not only be reactive, but proactive as well.

However, recent research approaches Safety-II, or the “New-View” as it is framed, as a collection of untested propositions, questioning whether these are valid or not.

What exactly is the New-View?

Officially seen as “Resilience Engineering (RE)”, this New-View concept has emerged in recent years aiming to redefine the way in which health and safety practitioners see safety, the role of people in safety; and how businesses specifically focus on safety. As a leader in the Safety-II concept, Professor Erik Hollnagel says the term is concerned with ensuring how and why things go right, rather than how and why they go wrong, as is the case with the Safety-I concept. Meanwhile, the closely related term of “Safety Differently” rejects the notion of “human error” as incident causation, viewing them as symptoms of system problems affecting Human Factors, according to Professor Sidney Dekker who has led research on the topic.

RelatedNews

AMSA to enhance compliance focus for 2022-23

RINA, SSI partner up to ensure safety of life-saving appliances

While the conventional approach focuses on prevention of harm through standards and rules, Safety-II focuses on promoting long-lasting resilience by promoting the human ability to work safely without adhering to the rule book. For example, an accident investigation under the scope of Safety-I is to identify the causes of adverse outcomes, while risk assessment aims to determine their likelihood. On the contrary, accident investigations under Safety-II seek to understand how things usually go right, as this forms the basis for explaining how things go wrong.

Safety I

Safety II

Learn from our errors

Learn from our successes

Safety defined by absence

Safety defined by presence

Reactive approach

Proactive approach

Understand what goes wrong

Understand what goes right

Accident causation

Repeat what goes right

Avoid errors

Enforce successful behaviors

Reduce losses

Create new process on successful behaviour

For shipping, an industry particularly vulnerable to safety and heavily reliant on rules and regulations, progressing from traditional safety approaches can be challenging, if not risky. Human error is estimated to account for around 80% of maritime accidents, but this cause is pretty vague and “barely scratches the surface of an incident investigation”, Alvin Forster from the North P&I Club has told SAFETY4SEA, arguing that, if someone did something wrong, then it is vital to understand why they did it.

The “New-View” Criticism

Challenging this new approach, a position paper by Dr. Dominic Cooper, a pioneer of behavioral safety and award-winning author, sparked discussions on a Safety-I versus Safety-II debate, arguing that there has been no peer-reviewed empirical evidence demonstrating whether any aspect of New-View’s propositions are valid and whether the New-View actually increases safety or reduces accidents. After being reviewed for over 15 months, the paper sparked controversy and nurtured the safety I vs Safety-II debate. The challenges regarding New-View, according to Dr. Cooper, surround the following areas:

  • How safety is defined

While the dipole “Safety-I = working safety” – “Safety-II = working safely” is an appealing way to approach conventional thinking on safety, Dr. Cooper argues that focusing on what goes right also presupposes a corresponding understanding of what goes wrong.

New-View writers and advocates have not defined a set of practical processes, tools, activities or combinations thereof, by which to improve safety per se. They rely on existing Safety-1 methodologies while persuading companies to adopt their ideas,

…he noted.

  • The role of people in safety

While Safety-1 sees people as “problems to be controlled”, New-View sees people as responsible contributors to solutions. However, the paper argues, the new concept misses the link of employee engagement, considering that engaged employees are less likely than non-engaged employees to experience safety incidents. According to Dr. Cooper, New-View advocates do not appear to offer new employee engagement practices, different than Safety-1 practices.

“The New-View writers’ need to explicitly call for companies to cede all decision-making power for safety to employees could be seen as a risky proposition: not least because it may blur boundaries between managerial and employee job roles that could cause relationship problems and may also require much more effort be put into safety communications to ensure everyone has necessary safety information at the right time and the right place.”

  • How businesses focus on safety

At a time when progress on safety has reached a plateau in many industries, Dr. Dekker has argued, “it seems that doing more of the same is simply going to get us more of the same – not something different.” The new concept provides people with the opportunity to encounter safety as an ethical responsibility rather than a bureaucratic obligation.

However, New-View advocates do not specify exactly what safety, as an ethical responsibility, actually means, says Dr. Cooper. An issue with increased safety bureaucracy is that some regulators use one-size-fits-all action-level goals for every business, either small or big, but this does not mean that SMSs are not vital in every organization. For instance, a major issue identified on the aftermath of Deepwater Horizon disaster was the lack of efficient SMS, strongly supporting that an SMS is vital for low-frequency events.

What does this mean for the future of safety?

Amid the complex nature of safety, it is probable that Safety-II serves as progress rather than a replacement of Safety-I, making the two concepts complementary. Indeed, from the very start of Safety-II emergence, Dr. Hollnagel underlined that “Safety-II is not a new discipline or a new practice but rather a new perspective on what happens and how it happens.”

Additionally, in an industry where human error is attributed to the majority of casualties, the view of humans as a safeguard and not a liability will be the foremost challenge. A starting point for organizations interested in a more progressed way of thinking is to emphasize on enhancing their employees’ resilience, as the ability to monitor things and handle situations, but the role of standards and regulations cannot be underestimated.

Both Safety-1 and New -View use exactly the same Safety-1 methodologies to tackle safety problems, albeit they might be used in different configurations…The inescapable conclusion, therefore, is ‘the emperor has no clothes’ and that ideology and emotion has triumphed over science and practice,

…Dr. Cooper concludes.

READ DR COOPER’S POSITION PAPER HERE

Tags: best practicescorporate lifelife onboardsafe working practicessafety culture

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

lng

SGMF launches guidance on rules for filling and loading LNG fuel tanks

July 6, 2022
Lessons learned: Emphasizing the hazardous areas around a vessel reduces risks

UK MAIB: Best practice when rigging pilot ladders

July 6, 2022
MARITIME EVENTS

Newsletter

GET THE SAFETY4SEA IN YOUR INBOX!

Explore

  • Safety
  • Green
  • Smart
  • Risk
  • Others
  • Events
  • Plus

Useful Links

  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policies
  • Advertising
  • Contact

© 2021 SAFETY4SEA

No Result
View All Result
  • Safety
    • Alerts
    • Accidents
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
  • Green
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
  • Smart
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
  • Risk
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
  • Others
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
  • Columns
    • Opinions
    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
  • Events
  • Plus

© 2021 SAFETY4SEA

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Disclaimer.