Subscribe to our Mailing Lists (It's free!)
Monday, May 16, 2022
SAFETY4SEA
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    Watch: RoPax ferry hits product tanker at dock

    Watch: Containership catches fire off East China sea

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    uk mca

    UK MCA: How offshore renewable energy installations can affect shipping

    seafarers connectivity

    ILO committee agrees on better social connectivity for seafarers

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    Cory, Northern Lights to collaborate on carbon capture and storage project

    Cory, Northern Lights to collaborate on carbon capture and storage project

    Mitsubishi Shipbuilding, NYK receive AiP for large LCO2 carrier

    Mitsubishi Shipbuilding, NYK receive AiP for large LCO2 carrier

    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    china battery powered cruise ship

    China: Delivery of battery powered cruise ship increases appetite for electric ship production

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    remote offshore inspections

    Demonstration shows capability of drones to conduct remote offshore inspections

    uk ship shore integration

    North Star to use AI to cut SOVs emissions

    zero44

    New start-up to help ships track their emissions

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    australia detains ship

    Six new foreign flagged ships detained in UK ports during April 2022

    IMO, Abuja MoU discuss ways to harmonize Port State Control

    IMO, Abuja MoU discuss ways to harmonize Port State Control

    indian mou

    Indian MoU PSC Annual Report 2021

    tokyo mou

    Tokyo MoU PSC Annual Report 2021

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    Singapore Chamber of Maritime

    Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 7-13 May

    Watch: RoPax ferry hits product tanker at dock

    Watch: Containership catches fire off East China sea

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    Career Paths: Päivi Brunou, Wärtsilä Voyage 

  • Columns
    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    Career Paths: Päivi Brunou, Wärtsilä Voyage 

    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    “Zero-Emission Shipping Mission” Roadmap promotes new green maritime solutions

    How EU ETS and IMO CII will change the Owner – Charterer relationship

    Trending Tags

    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Safety
    • All
    • Accidents
    • Alerts
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
    Watch: RoPax ferry hits product tanker at dock

    Watch: Containership catches fire off East China sea

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    uk mca

    UK MCA: How offshore renewable energy installations can affect shipping

    seafarers connectivity

    ILO committee agrees on better social connectivity for seafarers

  • Green
    • All
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
    Cory, Northern Lights to collaborate on carbon capture and storage project

    Cory, Northern Lights to collaborate on carbon capture and storage project

    Mitsubishi Shipbuilding, NYK receive AiP for large LCO2 carrier

    Mitsubishi Shipbuilding, NYK receive AiP for large LCO2 carrier

    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    china battery powered cruise ship

    China: Delivery of battery powered cruise ship increases appetite for electric ship production

  • Smart
    • All
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    TotalEnergies launches global drone-based methane and CO2 detection campaign

    remote offshore inspections

    Demonstration shows capability of drones to conduct remote offshore inspections

    uk ship shore integration

    North Star to use AI to cut SOVs emissions

    zero44

    New start-up to help ships track their emissions

  • Risk
    • All
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    australia detains ship

    Six new foreign flagged ships detained in UK ports during April 2022

    IMO, Abuja MoU discuss ways to harmonize Port State Control

    IMO, Abuja MoU discuss ways to harmonize Port State Control

    indian mou

    Indian MoU PSC Annual Report 2021

    tokyo mou

    Tokyo MoU PSC Annual Report 2021

  • Others
    • All
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
    Singapore Chamber of Maritime

    Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 7-13 May

    Watch: RoPax ferry hits product tanker at dock

    Watch: Containership catches fire off East China sea

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    Watch: Japanese freighter capsized off Honshu coast

    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    Career Paths: Päivi Brunou, Wärtsilä Voyage 

  • Columns
    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    Career Paths: Päivi Brunou, Wärtsilä Voyage 

    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    Career Paths: Catarina Fant, Wasaline

    “Zero-Emission Shipping Mission” Roadmap promotes new green maritime solutions

    How EU ETS and IMO CII will change the Owner – Charterer relationship

    Trending Tags

    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Resilience
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
  • Events
  • Plus
No Result
View All Result
SAFETY4SEA

Case study: Mooring line failure onboard

by The Editorial Team
December 3, 2019
in Loss Prevention, Maritime Knowledge
captain

Above image is used for illustration purposes only / Credit: Shutterstock

FacebookTwitterEmailLinkedin

A large LNG carrier was docked in an LNG terminal in UK. The 345.30m LOA carrier was moored with a total number of 20 lines (high modulus polyethylene ropes) following the ‘3-2-3-2 fore and aft’ rule. The vessel had 22 lines on board (as per manufacturer’s requirements) to be used during mooring operations of 44mm diameter Steelite Superline Xtra high modulus polyethylene (HMPE) with a specified minimum breaking load (MBL) of 137t.

 

Credit: UK MAIB Report 13/2017

While vessel was moored, a line parted and injured 3rd Officer who suffered severe injuries.  When the line parted the wind was westerly at about 32kts and the tidal stream was ebbing to the west at 0.6kt (the tidal range was 4m). The air temperature was about 6°C, it was raining and it was dark. These conditions were similar to those predicted in the local inshore weather forecasts. The prevailing wind was reaching max strength with extended gusts.  One of the fore spring lines parted due to tensile overload even though the load being applied to the line at the time was less than a quarter of its specified minimum breaking load.

But how did an inspected mooring rope part despite the monitoring and inspections of same as per Company’s requirements? All mooring lines had been subjected to regular visual inspections by the ship’s crew and the rope manufacturer’s representatives, and their condition had always been assessed to be good. The PMS required 4-monthly inspections of each rope. To do this, the ropes were removed from the winch drums and visually inspected over their entire length. The PMS provided information on types of damage to look for and guidance on rope rejection or discard criteria.

RelatedNews

Ensuring safe pilot transfer arrangements

Book Review: An industry management tool to develop crewing and training strategies

In order to prolong the life of the mooring ropes, the PMS recommended that:

  • Ropes normally used as ‘Springs’ should be rotated with other ropes every 2 years; and,
  • All ropes should be end-for-ended every 4 years.

The maintenance undertaken and observations made during the rope inspections were recorded in the vessel’s electronic PMS database. In addition, records were maintained of the air temperatures and wind speeds at the terminals while the vessel was moored.

Jacked rope construction

Accordingly, the main issue with such rope inspection is that jacketed design prevented the identification of key discard criteria such as broken yarns and fused fibres. In addition, other high modulus synthetic fibre rope condition degradation phenomena, such as creep, cannot readily be assessed without physically dissecting the rope.

GET THE SAFETY4SEA IN YOUR INBOX!

So were these ropes adequate for use on board such vessel in respect of size and operational envelop? As the official investigation concluded, the arrangement of mooring decks on board contributed significantly to the rope’s loss of strength and the officer being injured; the mooring lines used on board vessel (and similar vessels in the same fleet) were not suitable for the application; and the primary influences on rope degradation and failure modes were not fully understood by the user.

Close visual examination of the break site identified that the yarn fibres had suffered localised fusing and hardening, and that the failure had been caused by tensile overload. Away from the break site, the rope appeared to be in generally good condition.

Key feedback

A technical Company authorized to provide failure analysis based on broken line samples. The outcome of this analysis after investigation and laboratory measurements was that the inner part of jacked rope (3-strands) reveled yarn kinks which were effective to failure.

Credit: UK MAIB Report 13/2017

Based on the results of break load tests, and taking the number of failed yarns discovered in damaged rope into account, the authorized Company estimated that the residual strength of the rope samples tested could have been as low as 61.6t. This was about 45% of its specified MBL (137t).

Additionally, the painting of snap back areas had also contributed to the accident. As per previous Best Practice Guidance, areas near mooring points should be marked for the Snap-Back hazard.

Credit: UK Club / Back hazard area at the time of accident – No longer valid best Practice marking of snap

However, this practice created a false sense of safety in case the seafarer was not on or next to yellow marked area. Considering that the reaction of a broken line under tension practically is unknown and difficult to be predicted, such marking of “danger areas” is not actually a safety practice.

Lessons learned

Consequently, this incident and several other similar led to the revision of some of the mooring practices:

  1. The OCIMF Guidance for Mooring was revised to MEG-4 in order to address similar issues; new definitions were introduced and new guidance was provided in respect of purchasing, using, inspecting and retiring mooring lines.
  2. The practice regarding snap back zones was also revised; the markings on the deck were removed and replaced with the generic warning that all mooring decks are subject to snap-back hazard (Image 4)
  3. Effective procedures are now required to be inforce on board vessels in order to minimize incidents during mooring operations. A comprehensive and detailed risk assessment should be undertaken prior conducting such operations.
  4. An effective tool box meeting is to be conducted also in order to provide guidance on the established mooring plan taking into consideration: Vessel’s arrangements and equipment; Terminal or port arrangements and ; Prevailing and predicted environmental conditions
  5. Lastly, all mooring stations should be under the control and monitoring of a competent officer who should use a Stop work procedure or authorization in order to protect fellow seafarers and vessel’s equipment from unpleasant situations during mooring.
New developed approach to mark snap back danger areas / Credit: UK Club

 

MOORING PROCEDURES: Read in this series

itf global cruise lines

6 tips for safe mooring operations

December 13, 2019
captain

Case study: Mooring line failure onboard

December 3, 2019
Brazil

Mooring Equipment Guidelines: Updates and new terms

December 3, 2019
mooring injury

Mooring Incidents: Assessing common pitfalls and key challenges

December 2, 2019
hong kong lessons learned

Do’s and don’ts when dragging anchor

November 19, 2019
captain

Safe Mooring: Key challenges

October 9, 2019
killed mooring line

INTERTANKO publishes guide on Mooring System Management Plans and Line Management Plans

March 15, 2019
captain

OCIMF MEG 4 Review: Mooring lines issues in the spotlight

November 26, 2018
mooring

Procedures: Mooring line handling tips

August 23, 2018
killed mooring line

OCIMF Mooring Equipment Guidelines (MEG4) – An Update

August 6, 2018
Tags: lessons learnedmooringMooring Procedures cmsm

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Singapore Chamber of Maritime

Baltic Exchange: Maritime market highlights 7-13 May

May 16, 2022
Watch: RoPax ferry hits product tanker at dock

Watch: Containership catches fire off East China sea

May 16, 2022
MARITIME EVENTS

Newsletter

GET THE SAFETY4SEA IN YOUR INBOX!

Explore

  • Safety
  • Green
  • Smart
  • Risk
  • Others
  • Events
  • Plus

Useful Links

  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policies
  • Advertising
  • Contact

© 2021 SAFETY4SEA

No Result
View All Result
  • Safety
    • Alerts
    • Accidents
    • Loss Prevention
    • Maritime Health
    • Regulation
    • Safety
    • Seafarers
    • Security
  • Green
    • Arctic
    • Ballast
    • Emissions
    • Fuels
    • Green Shipping
    • Pollution
    • Ship Recycling
    • Technology
  • Smart
    • Connectivity
    • Cyber Security
    • E-navigation
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Maritime Software
    • Smart
  • Risk
    • CIC
    • Detentions
    • Fines
    • PSC Focus
    • Vetting
  • Others
    • Diversity in shipping
    • Maritime Knowledge
    • Offshore
    • Ports
    • Reports
    • Shipping
    • Sustainability
    • Videos
  • Columns
    • Opinions
    • Career Paths
    • Industry Voices
    • Maripedia
    • Maritime History
    • Seafarers Stories
    • SeaSense
  • Events
  • Plus

© 2021 SAFETY4SEA

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Disclaimer.